Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Mini Review
Original Article
Original Articles
Point of View
Review
Review Article
Short communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Mini Review
Original Article
Original Articles
Point of View
Review
Review Article
Short communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JHSR_11_2025

Air pollution spikes and health risks resulting from wheat crop residue burning in central India

Department of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Air), ICMR- National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhauri, Bhopal, India
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, ICMR- National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhauri, Bhopal, India

* Corresponding author: Dr. Satish Bhagwatrao Aher, PhD, Department of Environmental Monitoring and Exposure Assessment (Air), ICMR- National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhauri, Bhopal, 462030, India. satishbaher@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Aher SB, Raj D, Nandi S. Air pollution spikes and health risks resulting from wheat crop residue burning in central India. J Health Sci Res. doi: 10.25259/JHSR_11_2025

Abstract

Wheat residue burning, while traditionally common in North India, is becoming increasingly prevalent in Central India, especially in key wheat-producing states like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Chhattisgarh.. It is driven by a steady rise in wheat cultivation and production. This practice, primarily used for clearing land after harvest, releases harmful pollutants, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which have serious health implications for local populations. Short-term pollution spikes, particularly during the post-harvest months from March to May, lead to increased respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, disproportionately affecting vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing health conditions. Despite the negative environmental and health consequences, wheat residue burning remains prevalent due to its low cost and lack of effective alternatives. This review examines the rise in wheat production, crop residue generation, and the adverse effects of residue burning on air quality and public health in central India. The article explores potential solutions, including the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices such as zero-till farming, residue management technologies, and alternative disposal methods like composting and mulching. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of policy interventions, farmer education, and public awareness campaigns to reduce crop residue burning and its harmful effects. Addressing this issue requires a coordinated approach from farmers, policymakers, and public health professionals to mitigate air pollution and protect both human health and the environment in the region.

Keywords

Air pollution
Crop residue burning
Health risk
Particulate matter
wheat

INTRODUCTION

Agricultural residue burning is a widespread practice in India, especially in states such as Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.[1] After the wheat harvest, farmers burn crop residues to prepare the land for the next sowing season.[2]

In central India, wheat is one of the most widely cultivated crops, and the burning of crop residues significantly contributes to short-term spikes in air pollution.[3] This practice is linked to increased concentrations of harmful pollutants in the atmosphere, posing serious health risks to local populations. Recent studies have highlighted the detrimental health impacts of these short-term pollution events, particularly concerning respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.[4-7] These pollutants are known to irritate the lungs and worsen pre-existing health conditions, with vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and individuals with chronic illnesses at heightened risk.[8,9] Figure 1 illustrates the common causes and consequences of crop residue burning in India, while Figure 2 presents the available alternatives to this practice. Most previous studies have predominantly focused on northern India, highlighting a significant knowledge gap as compared with other regions. This review article aims to address this gap by examining the health risks associated with increased air pollution from wheat crop residue burning in central India, with particular emphasis on exposure to particulate matter and gaseous pollutants.

Causes and effects of crop residue burning in India.
Figure 1:
Causes and effects of crop residue burning in India.
Various alternatives to crop residue burning in India.
Figure 2:
Various alternatives to crop residue burning in India.

WHEAT PRODUCTION TRENDS IN INDIA

The year-wise wheat production in India from 1951-52 to 2021-22 shows a significant increase in total production over the decades [Figure 3]. The data reveals a steady rise in wheat production, from 6 million tons in 1951-52 to 109.59 million tons in 2020-21. Early years exhibit moderate growth, with production gradually rising above 10 million tons in the late 1950s. The most rapid increases occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, coinciding with the Green Revolution, which significantly boosted yields. By the 2000s and 2010s, India consistently produced over 70 million tons, peaking at 109.59 million tons in 2020-21.[10] However, there were fluctuations, especially around the early 2000s and 2014-15, when production slightly dropped, possibly due to climatic factors or changes in agricultural policies. The remarkable growth in wheat production from the 1960s onward was driven largely by technological advancements and the Green Revolution [Figure 3].

Year-wise wheat production in India.
Figure 3:
Year-wise wheat production in India.

The Green Revolution, initiated in the 1960s, introduced high-yielding varieties of wheat, increased fertilizer use, and improved irrigation methods, leading to significant productivity gains.[11] Wheat production also benefited from the establishment of more efficient agricultural infrastructure, including improved access to credit and market systems. The peak production in 2020-21 underscores the success of these efforts, although periodic fluctuations such as in 2014-15 demonstrate the vulnerability of wheat production to factors like droughts, floods, and changes in government policies.[12-14] Continuing challenges, such as water scarcity and soil degradation, may threaten long-term sustainability unless integrated and sustainable farming practices are further promoted.[15,16] The future of wheat production in India depends on adapting to these challenges while maintaining productivity through technological innovations and efficient resource management.

WHEAT PRODUCTION IN CENTRAL INDIA

Wheat production in central India is vital for the region’s agricultural economy and plays a crucial role in food security and the livelihoods of millions of farmers.[17] The region, including states like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Chhattisgarh, has seen significant growth in wheat production over the past few decades, due to improved farming practices, high-yielding varieties, and better irrigation techniques.[18] Madhya Pradesh, in particular, has become one of the leading wheat producers in India, with wheat covering a large portion of the state’s total agricultural area.[19] The primary wheat-growing season occurs during the rabi cycle (winter), with sowing between November and December and harvesting from March to May. Access to irrigation from canals and groundwater has supported wheat cultivation, even in the region’s semi-arid climate.[20] However, challenges such as erratic rainfall, soil fertility decline, and increasing pest problems threaten the sustainability of wheat production.[21] Additionally, post-harvest crop residue burning has become an environmental concern, contributing to air pollution and degrading soil health.[22-24] Despite these challenges, wheat remains a crucial crop in central India, and ongoing research into agronomic practices and climate resilience continues to shape its future.

TRENDS IN WHEAT PRODUCTION IN MAJOR STATES

The annual wheat production (in million tons) for the three major wheat-producing states in India, viz., Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Punjab, from 2013 to 2023 has been presented in Figure 4.

Year-wise wheat production in top three states of India.
Figure 4:
Year-wise wheat production in top three states of India.

The data reveals fluctuating trends in wheat production across these states, with Uttar Pradesh consistently being the highest producer, followed by Madhya Pradesh and Punjab. Over the period, Uttar Pradesh’s wheat production shows a steady increase from 29.89 million tons in 2013-14 to 35.51 million tons in 2020-21, before slightly declining to 33.61 million tons in 2022-23.[10] Madhya Pradesh also demonstrates an upward trend, reaching its peak in 2021-22 at 22.98 million tons, while Punjab’s production fluctuates but generally declines from 17.62 million tons in 2013-14 to 14.86 million tons in 2021-22, before slightly increasing in 2022-23. These trends highlight significant regional differences in wheat production. Uttar Pradesh has maintained its dominance in wheat production due to favorable agricultural practices, irrigation facilities, and government support, aligning with improvements in mechanization and agricultural techniques.[25] Madhya Pradesh’s production shows a remarkable increase, especially in recent years, indicating the successful adoption of high-yielding varieties, better irrigation infrastructure, and effective implementation of government schemes.[19,20] Punjab’s declining wheat production can be attributed to factors such as soil degradation, water scarcity, and over-reliance on traditional farming practices, which are less sustainable in the long term.[26-28] Overall, while Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh have seen steady increases, the challenges faced by Punjab underscore the importance of sustainable agricultural practices to maintain and enhance wheat productivity in India.

CROP RESIDUE GENERATION AND BURNING TRENDS IN INDIA

The trends in crop residue generation and crop residue burning in India from 1950-51 to 2017-18 have been presented in Figure 5.[29-31]

Trends in crop residue generation and crop residue burning in India.
Figure 5:
Trends in crop residue generation and crop residue burning in India.

The data reveals a clear upward trend in both crop residue generation and burning over the years. Crop residue generation increased from 80 thousand gigagrams (Gg) in 1950-51 to 517 thousand Gg in 2017-18. Similarly, crop residue burning grew from 18 thousand Gg in 1950-51 to 116 thousand Gg in 2017-18, reflecting increased reliance on burning as a method of residue disposal. This suggests that while crop production has increased, the management of crop residues, particularly through burning, has become more prevalent and potentially more harmful to the environment. The rising generation of crop residues is a direct result of the intensification of agricultural practices, including higher crop yields and the use of advanced farming technologies.[32,33] However, the rise in crop residue burning is a significant environmental concern, contributing to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and soil degradation.[34] While burning offers farmers a quick and inexpensive way to manage crop residues, it is also linked to severe health hazards due to the emission of particulate matter and toxins.[2,35] The increase in burning from 1950 to 2017 is particularly concerning in states like Punjab and Haryana, where large-scale stubble burning during harvest seasons is common.[36,37] Efforts to address this issue include promoting alternative residue management practices, such as composting and using crop residues for bioenergy production.[38,39] Nonetheless, balancing crop residue disposal methods with sustainable farming practices remains a challenge.

Between 2017 and 2024, India witnessed significant fluctuations in crop residue generation and burning, shaped by changing agricultural practices, evolving policy measures, and varying environmental conditions. By 2020, emissions from crop residue burning had surged by approximately 75% since 2011, reaching an estimated 33,834 Gg of CO₂-equivalent annually. In response, several state governments intensified their efforts to curb stubble burning through awareness campaigns and the promotion of alternative management techniques. Uttar Pradesh, for example, saw a 65% reduction in stubble burning cases from 8,784 in 2017 to 3,017 in 2022, largely due to improved outreach and support for sustainable farming methods. Similarly, Punjab reported a 26% decline in such incidents between 2022 and 2023, aided by the deployment of over 23,000 crop residue management machines. Despite these improvements, the issue remains far from resolved. In 2024, Punjab aimed to manage 19.5 million tonnes (MT) of crop residue, with 15.86 MT addressed through in-situ and ex-situ approaches. This underscores the continuing need for comprehensive and scalable residue management strategies. The Supreme Court of India, in a strong statement in October 2024, called for stricter enforcement and enhanced policy implementation, highlighting the gaps in current efforts. Overall, while certain regions have made measurable progress in reducing crop residue burning, the practice persists due to systemic barriers such as limited infrastructure, economic constraints, and inconsistent enforcement. Moving forward, coordinated efforts that combine technological support, financial incentives, and regulatory enforcement will be critical to addressing the environmental and public health challenges associated with crop residue burning in India.

WHEAT RESIDUE BURNING AND AIR POLLUTION IN CENTRAL INDIA

Wheat residue burning, traditionally more common in North India, is increasingly prevalent in Central India, particularly in major wheat-producing states such as Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Chhattisgarh, driven by the steady rise in wheat cultivation and production in these regions [Figure 2]. After the wheat harvest, farmers burn crop residues to quickly prepare the land for the next planting cycle. This practice has been increasing due to the pressures of intensive farming and a lack of effective alternatives for residue management.[40] Studies estimate that around 25-30% of total crop residues in Central India are burned annually, with wheat residue burning alone contributing approximately 177,046.73 Gg/year of CO₂, 10,751.33 Gg/year of CO, 315.51 Gg/year of CH₄, 8.18 Gg/year of N₂O, and 292.15 Gg/year of NOₓ. This large-scale emission of greenhouse gases and pollutants significantly exacerbates air pollution and environmental degradation in the region.[41] The increasing mechanization of agriculture, which leaves behind large quantities of residue that are difficult to manage, has intensified this trend.[2] The burning of wheat residues releases pollutants, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which severely impact air quality and public health, particularly in urban and rural areas.[37,42] Despite the negative effects, alternative residue management techniques such as mulching, composting, or using machinery like the Happy Seeder remain underutilized due to economic constraints and a lack of awareness among farmers.[43,44] Addressing wheat residue burning is critical for reducing air pollution and promoting sustainable agricultural practices in central India.

Wheat crop residue burning trends in Central India are less widespread compared to Northern India, where the practice is most prevalent. In states like Punjab, Haryana, and Western Uttar Pradesh, wheat residue burning is driven by the rice-wheat cropping system and mechanized harvesting, with little time between wheat harvest and rice sowing to manage stubble through other means. In Central India, particularly in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and parts of Maharashtra, wheat production is becoming increasingly intensive. With the growing adoption of mechanized harvesting, farmers are more inclined to resort to residue burning as a quick and cost-effective method to prepare fields for the next cropping cycle. While wheat residue burning is less common in Eastern, Western, and Southern India, where wheat is either grown on a smaller scale or not at all, crop residue burning in general remains a concern, especially with rice stubble in some regions. Overall, while North India remains the epicenter of wheat residue burning, Central India is experiencing a rise in this practice as wheat cultivation expands, emphasizing the need for alternative management practices to mitigate environmental and health impacts.

HEALTH RISKS OF AIR POLLUTION FROM WHEAT CROP RESIDUE BURNING

Wheat crop residue burning poses significant health risks, primarily due to the release of harmful air pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). These pollutants are emitted when wheat residues are burned after harvest, a practice common in states like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Chhattisgarh.[37,40] Among these pollutants, PM2.5 is particularly concerning as it can penetrate deep into the respiratory system, causing inflammation and exacerbating respiratory conditions like asthma, bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).[45-48]

VOCs play a significant role in worsening air pollution and human health, particularly in areas affected by crop residue burning. These compounds contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone and secondary particulate matter, both of which degrade air quality and pose serious health risks. Prolonged exposure to VOCs can lead to a range of respiratory issues, including asthma, bronchitis, COPD, and lung irritation. VOCs also contribute to cardiovascular problems by causing inflammation in blood vessels, increasing the risk of atherosclerosis and high blood pressure. Some VOCs, such as benzene, formaldehyde, and toluene, are known carcinogens, significantly raising the risk of lung cancer and other cancers over time. Furthermore, long-term exposure can lead to neurological effects, such as memory impairment, cognitive decline, and mood disorders, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like children and the elderly. In regions where crop residue burning is common, VOCs are released into the air, aggravating the overall pollution and worsening health outcomes, especially for individuals with pre-existing respiratory or heart conditions. The synergistic effect of VOCs with other pollutants, such as particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, increases the toxicity of the air, further heightening the health risks for those exposed.

Exposure to pollutants from crop residue burning, particularly fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), has several detrimental effects on respiratory health. These particles can penetrate deep into the lungs, reaching the alveoli, where they trigger the release of cytokines and chemokines, activating immune cells and leading to chronic inflammation, an underlying factor in asthma, bronchitis, and COPD. Additionally, pollutants generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that overwhelm the body’s antioxidant defence, resulting in oxidative stress and damage to airway epithelial cells, thereby impairing lung function and increasing susceptibility to infections. In children, long-term exposure to such pollutants can hinder lung development, reduce overall lung capacity, and elevate the risk of childhood asthma and lifelong respiratory complications. Furthermore, VOCs and particulate-bound allergens may sensitize the immune system, heightening the risk of allergic conditions such as allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Long-term exposure to these pollutants is also linked to cardiovascular diseases, such as heart attacks and strokes.[4,49] Pollutants released during crop residue burning can adversely affect cardiovascular health through several interconnected mechanisms. When inhaled, fine particulate matter and gaseous pollutants can enter the bloodstream from the lungs, triggering low-grade systemic inflammation that damages blood vessels and contributes to atherosclerosis and vascular dysfunction. These pollutants also impair the function of endothelial cells lining the blood vessels, reducing nitric oxide availability, which leads to vasoconstriction and elevated blood pressure. Additionally, exposure can disrupt the autonomic nervous system, decreasing heart rate variability and increasing sympathetic nervous activity, thereby heightening the risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac events. Moreover, pollutants promote a pro-thrombotic state by increasing blood coagulability, which can result in the formation of clots, raising the likelihood of heart attacks and strokes. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions, are particularly at risk from the health impacts of air pollution from crop residue burning.[7] Short-term pollution spikes during the post-harvest season have been associated with a rise in hospital admissions and emergency visits for respiratory and cardiovascular ailments.[50]

In November 2017, Delhi-NCR faced one of its most severe air pollution episodes, with Air Quality Index (AQI) levels soaring beyond 999 in several locations, far exceeding the “hazardous” threshold. This alarming spike was primarily attributed to large-scale crop residue burning in Punjab and Haryana, compounded by low wind speeds and persistent vehicular emissions that caused pollutants to remain trapped near the surface. The health impact was immediate and widespread: hospitals across the region reported a 30-40% increase in cases of respiratory distress, including asthma attacks, wheezing, eye irritation, and chronic coughing. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) noted a sharp rise in pediatric respiratory admissions. A subsequent report in The Lancet linked this acute exposure to elevated hospitalizations for cardiopulmonary conditions. In response, authorities closed schools, restricted outdoor activities, and declared a public health emergency.

Similarly, a year-round study conducted in 2018 by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), in collaboration with the WHO and local hospitals, investigated the impact of air pollution on cardiovascular health in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, one of India’s most polluted cities. The study focused especially on the peak pollution months from October to January, when PM₂.₅ levels frequently exceeded 200 µg/m3. Prolonged exposure to such high concentrations of fine particulate matter was found to significantly elevate biomarkers associated with inflammation and blood coagulation. As a result, the study observed a 20-25% higher prevalence of hypertension and ischemic heart disease among the exposed population. Additionally, participants demonstrated reduced heart rate variability, a known early indicator of cardiac dysfunction. Many individuals also reported worsening of pre-existing cardiovascular conditions during the winter months, underscoring the serious health risks linked to seasonal air pollution spikes.

These case studies highlight the alarming health impacts of air pollution spikes, particularly in regions like Delhi and Kanpur, where high levels of particulate matter and other pollutants significantly affect public health. In both cases, exposure to elevated levels of air pollution led to a marked increase in respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, with vulnerable populations, such as children and individuals with pre-existing health conditions, suffering the most. The Delhi Smog Crisis of 2017 underscored the immediate health threats posed by crop residue burning and seasonal weather conditions, while the ICMR study in Kanpur demonstrated the long-term cardiovascular risks linked to chronic exposure to polluted air. These findings emphasize the urgent need for effective air quality management and public health interventions to mitigate the devastating health consequences of air pollution in India.

MITIGATING AIR POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISKS

Mitigating air pollution from wheat crop residue burning in central India requires a multi-pronged approach involving technological innovation, policy interventions, and farmer education. A promising solution is the adoption of zero-till farming and residue management technologies, such as the Happy Seeder, which enables farmers to sow crops without burning residues.[43] These technologies not only reduce the need for residue burning but also improve soil health and crop yield. Promoting alternative residue management techniques like composting, mulching, and integrating residues into animal feed can further reduce the volume of burnable crop waste.[51] Financial incentives, such as subsidies for machinery and equipment that aid in residue management, can encourage farmers to adopt sustainable practices.[52,53] Public awareness campaigns that highlight the health risks and environmental impacts of burning, along with stronger enforcement of regulations, can also play a crucial role in reducing air pollution.[54] Additionally, investments in research and development to provide region-specific solutions and improve the viability of alternatives will be essential. By combining these strategies, central India can adopt more sustainable agricultural practices that protect both air quality and public health. Table 1 presents a comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of sustainable agricultural practices for crop residue management in India, focusing on small-scale versus large-scale farmers.

Table 1: Comparison of feasibility and effectiveness of sustainable agricultural practices for small-scale vs. Large-scale farmers
Crop residue management strategies Small-scale Farmers Large-scale Farmers
In-situ Management Practices
Feasibility High upfront cost for machinery, limited access to subsidies, and labor constraints make it less feasible. Easier access to machinery, better financial capacity, and subsidies make it more feasible.
Effectiveness Effective in improving soil health, but hindered by logistical challenges (e.g., inadequate machinery or labor). Highly effective, improves soil health, reduces burning, and is easier to scale due to access to machinery.
Ex-situ Utilization of Crop Residue
Feasibility Limited infrastructure, low access to markets for selling residue, lack of processing facilities. Easier access to markets, transportation, and infrastructure for residue processing or selling.
Effectiveness Less effective due to logistical issues and lack of market access for residue use. Highly effective, can generate additional income from bioenergy, animal fodder, or industrial use.
Government Schemes and Mechanization Support
Feasibility Limited access to government schemes due to bureaucratic hurdles and high initial costs for machinery. Easier access to subsidies and mechanization schemes, can invest in high-tech equipment.
Effectiveness Can be effective if targeted properly (e.g., low-cost equipment on rent, forming cooperatives). Highly effective, facilitates the adoption of sustainable practices on a larger scale, leading to environmental and economic benefits.

Policies and regulations currently exist to curb residue burning in India

India has implemented several policies and regulations to curb crop residue burning, including the Crop Residue Management (CRM) Scheme, which provides financial support for adopting sustainable residue management practices like the Happy Seeder and bioenergy utilization, and Punjab’s Prevention of Stubble Burning Act (2013), which makes burning a punishable offense. However, the effectiveness of these policies has been limited by factors such as high upfront costs, insufficient infrastructure, and lack of awareness, particularly among small-scale farmers. While the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) aims to reduce air pollution, including from crop burning, its progress has been slow due to broader air quality issues and inadequate enforcement. In states like Haryana, where financial assistance is provided for alternative practices, challenges like poor coordination and limited mechanization access persist. Additionally, awareness campaigns have had limited success in changing long-standing practices, and policies like irrigation schemes and bioenergy incentives indirectly address residue burning but lack direct impact. Despite some progress, effective reduction of crop residue burning requires better access to affordable alternatives, more targeted support for small farmers, and stronger enforcement mechanisms.

Recent policy initiatives on crop residue burning in India and their Impact

India has recently introduced several policies and guidelines aimed at curbing crop residue burning, a major contributor to air pollution in northern India. The Haryana Ex-Situ Management of Paddy Straw Policy 2023 seeks to eliminate stubble burning by 2027 by promoting the use of paddy straw in sustainable energy production like electricity and biogas, while offering subsidies and financial incentives to farmers. Similarly, the central government’s Revised Crop Residue Management Guidelines (2023–24) support pilot projects and equipment subsidies to manage paddy straw, with a funding structure involving government, industry, and farmers. To address machinery access, especially high-horsepower tractors, the 2024 guidelines also provide an 80% subsidy to Custom Hiring Centers. Additionally, Bihar’s ‘Name and Shame’ policy aims to deter stubble burning by publicly identifying repeat offenders and denying them government benefits.

In Central India, residue burning has prompted varied government responses across Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and Maharashtra. Madhya Pradesh has implemented strict enforcement measures, including a statewide ban under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, fines up to ₹25 lakh, FIRs, and penalties ranging from ₹2,500 to ₹15,000 based on landholding size. From May 2025, farmers engaging in stubble burning are also barred from availing benefits under schemes like the CM Kisan Kalyan Yojana and minimum support price (MSP) procurement. To aid compliance, the state has distributed over 31,000 residue management machines with subsidies up to 50% and is actively running awareness campaigns. In contrast, Chhattisgarh addresses the issue more indirectly through the Godhan Nyay Yojana, launched in 2020, which purchases cow dung to produce compost, offering both environmental and economic incentives that reduce the need for burning. Maharashtra, while lacking a centralized anti-burning policy, promotes local innovations such as using stubble for fodder, compost, and construction materials, and offers machinery subsidies up to ₹1.05 lakh. Though MP leads in enforcement, Chhattisgarh’s organic-focused model and Maharashtra’s community-led practices present sustainable alternatives that may be scaled across the region.

These efforts bring several key benefits. They aim to reduce air pollution, particularly in the post-harvest months, and improve public health by limiting toxic emissions. Environmentally, incorporating crop residue into the soil enhances soil fertility and reduces reliance on synthetic fertilizers. Economically, the policies support the development of bioenergy sectors and create new opportunities for farmers and entrepreneurs. Importantly, they empower farmers by offering subsidies and technological support, enabling a shift toward more sustainable agricultural practices.

However, challenges remain in implementing these policies effectively. Many small and marginal farmers still face high upfront costs for machinery, and awareness about sustainable alternatives is limited in rural areas. Delayed fund disbursements, monitoring issues, and poor infrastructure for collection and processing also hinder success. To maximize impact, India must ensure robust enforcement, timely funding, farmer education, and better infrastructure. A combination of supportive incentives and accountability measures will be crucial in transforming these well-intentioned guidelines into lasting environmental and agricultural improvements.

Recent technological advancements in crop residue management in India

India has witnessed several recent technological advancements in crop residue management aimed at reducing stubble burning and its associated environmental and health impacts. Notably, the Rotary Disc Drill, developed by the ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, has been granted a patent. This innovative machine allows for direct seeding of various crops like wheat, rice, soybean, and pulses in the presence of both anchored and loose crop residues, minimizing soil disturbance and power requirements. Additionally, the Happy Seeder, a no-till planter, enables sowing seeds directly into the residue of the previous crop without the need for prior seedbed preparation, effectively managing stubble without burning. The Pusa Decomposer, developed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), is a microbial solution that accelerates the decomposition of paddy straw, converting it into valuable fertilizer and reducing the need for burning. On the ex-situ front, the government has supported the establishment of palletization and torrefaction plants, which convert paddy straw into valuable products, further reducing the environmental impact of crop residue burning. These technological innovations, supported by government initiatives and private sector involvement, are pivotal in addressing the challenges of crop residue management in India.​

Socioeconomic barriers to the adoption of alternative crop residue management practices in India

Adopting alternative crop residue disposal methods in India is hindered by several socioeconomic barriers, including high initial investment and operational costs for machinery like the Happy Seeder and rotary tillers, which are often unaffordable for small-scale farmers. Even with subsidies, access to financial support is limited by bureaucratic challenges and high interest rates on loans. Additionally, there are geographical disparities in access to technology, with remote areas lacking the necessary infrastructure or rental services for modern equipment. Farmers also face labor shortages and time constraints, as alternative methods like in-situ incorporation require more time and labor during the narrow window between harvest and sowing, leading many to choose cheaper, quicker burning methods. Furthermore, there is a lack of awareness about the benefits of sustainable practices, coupled with resistance to change due to uncertainty about long-term gains. Policy and institutional challenges, such as weak enforcement of stubble burning bans and inadequate support for large-scale adoption, further complicate the situation. Lastly, short-term economic pressures and the lack of market value for crop residue discourage farmers from investing in alternatives. These barriers highlight the need for improved infrastructure, financial incentives, and comprehensive training to facilitate the widespread adoption of alternative residue management practices.

Overview of recent studies on crop residue burning in India

Recent research on crop residue burning in India highlights the complex interplay of environmental, socio-economic, and policy-driven factors influencing the practice. A study by Erbaugh et al.[55] explored farmer perspectives in Punjab, revealing that while subsidies for CRM machinery and penalties for stubble burning exist, they are often perceived as inequitable and ineffective. The study emphasized the critical role of cooperative societies in enabling access to CRM technologies and advocated for lowering economic risks associated with adopting sustainable alternatives. In parallel, a 2025 environmental impact analysis conducted in Madhya Pradesh employed life cycle assessment (LCA) and Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the consequences of residue burning from key crops like rice and sugarcane.[40] The findings revealed substantial contributions to particulate matter formation and global warming potential, as well as a 21% increase in marine eutrophication per kilogram of residue burned. This study underscores the environmental urgency of promoting alternatives such as composting and biochar use. Focusing on the eastern region, another study investigated the socio-technical drivers behind the emerging trend of crop residue burning in Bihar.[56] The researchers identified complex interactions between livestock systems, policy gaps, and local practices, calling for integrated mitigation approaches that align both social and technical dimensions. Complementing this, a high-resolution observational study conducted over the Punjab–Haryana–Delhi region confirmed the significant role of post-monsoon stubble burning in elevating PM₂.₅ concentrations, exacerbating air pollution and public health risks.[57] Finally, a comprehensive field study involving over 1,000 rural households in Punjab analyzed adoption patterns of no-burn agricultural methods.[58] It concluded that access to equipment and exposure to multiple learning platforms significantly influenced farmers’ willingness to use crop residue as mulch rather than burning it. The study recommended expanding equipment accessibility and training programs to promote sustainable residue management practices across diverse land classes. Overall, these recent studies contribute valuable insights into the ongoing challenges and evolving responses to crop residue burning in India. They collectively suggest that while technological and policy solutions are essential, the success of any intervention largely depends on equitable access, farmer engagement, and localized implementation strategies.

Way forward

To address the health risks and environmental degradation associated with crop residue burning, a multi-pronged approach is necessary. This includes raising awareness among farmers about the detrimental impacts of residue burning, strengthening air quality monitoring systems, and implementing public health interventions, particularly during high-pollution periods. Furthermore, policy frameworks that incentivize sustainable farming practices and enforce regulations against open burning can significantly reduce the occurrence of crop residue burning. Collaboration between government bodies, agricultural stakeholders, and public health organizations will be essential to create viable solutions that both protect air quality and improve the health of affected communities.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, wheat crop residue burning in central India represents a critical challenge for both public health and environmental sustainability. The practice becoming widespread in major wheat-producing states like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Chhattisgarh, significantly contributes to air pollution and exacerbates respiratory and cardiovascular health problems. The harmful pollutants released, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), pose serious risks to vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing conditions. While the practice of burning remains entrenched due to economic and logistical reasons, it is imperative that alternative residue management techniques, such as composting, mulching, and the use of technology like the Happy Seeder, are promoted and adopted. Ultimately, addressing the health risks of crop residue burning requires a holistic, long-term commitment to sustainable agricultural practices and public health interventions. By fostering an environment of education, technological innovation, and supportive policy, central India can mitigate the adverse effects of wheat crop residue burning and pave the way for a healthier, more sustainable future.

Authors’ contributions

SBA: Conceptualized the study, conducted the literature review, acquired the data, and drafted the manuscript; DR: Contributed to data analysis, prepared the figures, and assisted in manuscript writing: SN: Critically reviewed the first draft and provided constructive feedback for its improvement. All authors contributed to refining the study design and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . Crop residue burning: Is it a boon or a bane? Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2022;53:2353-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Agricultural crop residue burning and its environmental impacts and potential causes–case of northwest India. J Environ Plann Manag Manage. 2021;64:464-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Air quality impacts of crop residue burning in India and mitigation alternatives. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6537.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:2331-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Respiratory health of school children in relation to their body mass index (BMI) during crop residue burning events in North Western India. MAPAN. 2018;33:113-22.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Agriculture Crop residue burning and its consequences on respiration health of school-going children. Glob Pediatr Health. 2019;6:2333794X19874679.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Risk of acute respiratory infection from crop burning in India: Estimating disease burden and economic welfare from satellite and national health survey data for 250 000 persons. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:1113-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut. 2008;151:362-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution—REVIHAAP project. WHO Regional Office for Europe; . p. :1-309.
  10. Government of India (2023). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2023. Department of agriculture, Cooperation farmers welfare, Directorate of economics statistics, Government of India. https://agriwelfare.gov.in/Documents/CWWGDATA/Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf [Last accessed 2025 Jan 25].
  11. . Genesis and growth of the yield revolution in wheat in India: Lessons for shaping our agricultural destiny. Agric Res. 2013;2:183-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Challenges to wheat production in South Asia. Euphytica. 2007;157:447-56.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Enhancing wheat production- A global perspective. Indian J Agri Sci. 2015;85:03-1.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Wheat in Asia: Trends, challenges and research priorities. In: New Horizons in Wheat and Barley Research New Horizons in Wheat and Barley Research. Springer Singapore; . p. :33-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . Challenges for Crop production research in improving land use, productivity and sustainability. Sustainability. 2013;5:1632-44.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Challenges and opportunities for agricultural sustainability in changing climate scenarios: A perspective on Indian agriculture. Trop Ecol. 2019;60:167-85.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Variability and Growth in Production of Wheat in India. Economic Affairs. 2020;65:255-260.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Statistical assessment of trend analysis on production of wheat crop over India. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2010;36:178-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , . Forecasting of area, production and productivity of wheat crop in Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Econ Dev. 2022;18:577-86.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Irrigation induced growth of wheat production in different agro-climatic zones of Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Agricultural Econ. 2015;70:392.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Current research status and future challenges to wheat production in India. Indian J Biotechnol. 2015;14:445-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . Connecting crop productivity, residue fires, and air quality over Northern India. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16594.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . Crop residue burning and its implications over North-West India. J Agricultural Phys. 2021;21:316-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Environmental and health impacts of crop residue burning: Scope of sustainable crop residue management practices. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4753.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Perspective of enhancing wheat production and productivity in Uttar Pradesh by improving varietal replacement rate. Journal of Cereal Research. 2020;12:19-22.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. . An analytical study into growth and variability in area, yield and production of wheat in Punjab. Indi Jour of Econ and Develop. 2014;10:146.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Challenges of growth and sustainability. In: Sustainable development in India Sustainable development in India. Routledge; . p. :160-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , . Emerging issues and potential opportunities in the rice–wheat cropping system of North-Western India. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:832683.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  29. Government of India. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2018. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of India. 2018. https://desagri.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Agricultural-Statistics-at-a-Glance-2018.pdf [Last accessed 2025 Jan 23].
  30. Economic survey 2019–20. Statistical appendix. 2020. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/economicsurvey/doc/Statistical-Appendix-in-English.pdf [Last accessed 2025 Jan 23].
  31. , , , . Nexus Between Crop Residue Burning, Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development Goals Over North-Western India. Front. Energy Res.. 2021;8:614212.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. . Crop residue generation and management in Punjab State. Indi Jour of Econ and Develop. 2016;12:477.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. . Generation and impact of crop residue and its management. Curr Agri Res Jour. 2019;7:304-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. , . Crop residue burning: effects on environment. In: Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Challenges, Technologies and Solutions. Singapore: Springer Singapore; . p. :127-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , . A state of the art review in crop residue burning in India: Previous knowledge, present circumstances and future strategies. Environmental Challenges. 2022;8:100581.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Spatio-temporal characterization of agriculture residue burning in Punjab and Haryana, India, using MODIS and Suomi NPP VIIRS data. Curr Sci. 2015;109:1850.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Quantifying the high resolution seasonal emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Environ Pollut. 2021;286:117165.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , . Crop residue management in India: Stubble burning vs other utilizations including bioenergy. Energies. 2021;14:4281.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , . Assessment of bioenergy generation potential of agricultural crop residues in India. CircEconSust. 2021;1:1335-48.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , . Environmental impact analysis of crop residue burning in Madhya Pradesh: A multivariate comparison across key crops. Environ Monit Assess. 2025;197:211.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . MODIS-derived fire characteristics and greenhouse gas emissions from cropland residue burning in Central India. Sustainability. 2022;14:16612.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Evaluation of pollutants emitted from open field crop residue burning in Punjab, India. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering”, “Recent trends in thermal engineering Lecture notes in mechanical engineering”, “Recent Trends in thermal engineering. Springer Singapore; . p. :203-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Changing agricultural stubble burning practices in the Indo-Gangetic plains: Is the happy seeder a profitable alternative? Int J Agricult Sustain. 2021;19:128-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , . Do attributes of happy seeder technology influence its adoption speed? An investigation using duration analysis in Northern India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2023;21:2198324.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , . Effects of exposure to rice-crop residue burning smoke on pulmonary functions and oxygen saturation level of human beings in Patiala (India) Sci Total Environ. 2012;429:161-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , . Respiratory health concerns in children at some strategic locations from high PM levels during crop residue burning episodes. Atmos Environ. 2016;137:127-34.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Health and environmental consequences of crop residue burning correlated with increasing crop yields midst India’s Green Revolution. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science,. 2022;5:81.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , . Assessment of the adverse effect of crop residue burning on respiratory health: A case study of Patiala, India. Lancet Planetary Health. 2022;6:S5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , . Crop fires and cardiovascular health–a study from North India. SSM-Population Health. 2021;14:100757.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. Application of machine learning approaches to predict the impact of ambient air pollution on outpatient visits for acute respiratory infections. Sci Total Environ. 2023;858:159509.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. Fields on fire: Alternatives to crop residue burning in India. Science. 2019;365:536-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , . Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:832.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , et al. Unlocking the unsustainable rice-wheat system of Indian Punjab: Assessing alternatives to crop-residue burning from a systems perspective. Ecological Economics. 2022;195:107364.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , . Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions. J Cleaner Prod. 2019;208:261-73.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , . Farmer perspectives on crop residue burning and sociotechnical transition in Punjab, India. J Rural Stud. 2024;111:103387.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , et al. Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India. Agron Sustain Dev. 2024;44:59.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , , , . 2024 Impact of post monsoon crop residue burning on PM 2.5 over North India: Optimizing emissions using a high-density in situ surface observation network. EGUsphere 2024:1-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , , et al. Mitigating agricultural residue burning: Challenges and solutions across land classes in Punjab, India. Environ Res: Food Syst. 2024;1:015001.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections